2027 presidential race · offer under watch
Candidates: judge the offer, don't take voting advice
This site does not tell anyone to abstain. It listens to people who have already made that choice — and here it monitors figures discussed for 2027 with sourced public facts, so anyone can judge without being handed a ballot instruction.
Blunt tone: trust is broken. Fuzzy representation, tactical voting that locks the field, contested records, investigations or convictions when they exist. Nothing invented: if a claim does not hold, it is not here. Updated: .
Declared Expected / primary Withdrawn
For majority judgment (median of verbal grades), see Resources and the video Science Étonnante — Réformons l'élection présidentielle! (David Louapre, 2016).
Eight figures in play (Sept. 2026)
Indicative selection, not an official candidacy list. Quick takes and majority judgment stay on your device (localStorage) — this is not an Appstention poll.
Majority judgment (local)
Grade every candidate on the same verbal scale. Ranking uses the median grade (best to worst: Excellent → Good → Fair → Passable → Insufficient → Reject). Same median: simple tie-break by the share of grades strictly above the median.